I attended a highly enjoyable eLearning course the previous day. The layout was impressive; the interactions were well organized and engaging, and the content was completely laid out. Other than the audio, this is the situation that went to for worst. The course featured voice-overs on every screen, and the voice-overs were made using software that converts text into speech. I have never been a big fan of software that converts text into speech. Whatever "modern" it is it sounds essentially the same. It consistently sounds unnatural. And that takes me back to the course I reviewed. In my opinion, the course was so attractive that it did not require any audio at all. I understand that some will imply that every course should have audio to make it without character, but I don't think that's the case. There are some instances that audio can be enjoyable but not significant. This particular course had been designed using Captivate and used the built-in function of text to speech. In terms of text-to-speech is concerned I'm going to say that Captivate does possess some of the best voices that I've heard. However, no one watching would think they were real human voices. The voice at first is entertaining, but as time proceeds, it begins to bother you. You begin to hear every one of those mangled, unnatural syllable and towards the closing you're ready for the end of the course. Visit:- https://vbee.vn/home I am completely going out on a limb However, I cannot assume that the creators of Captivate had any intention of allowing an original course with text-to-speech in every frame. I think they gave the ability to satisfy users who used other programs that subsequently incorporated the capability of text-to-speech. I do know it's an alternative to create voice-over audio courses that will be favored by those who are visually impaired therefore I give it to Adobe. I'm sure that professional voice over employment can be expensive. And I grasp that some users don't like making use of their own voices to create eLearning courses. However, I recognize that voice-overs may not create the type of impact that many developers contemplate. Many developers add voice overs in order to please customers, and this is a mistake. If the voiceover doesn't enhance the particular learning capacity of the course, take it out. If a client does seek the use of voice-overs for a course and you consider it to be something that enhances learning, discuss with them about hiring a professional. If they are interested in text to speech, make the case to them that it's useful for brief spoken texts, perhaps for an introduction or objectives list, but do not recommend it as a whole course. Bear in mind, you're the expert and the customer relies on you to make the right decisions similar to this. The majority of people will be in agreement with you as long as furnish them with quality evidence regarding the reasons why text to speech isn't acceptable. A final point that, as an eLearning developer, it is essential to have a few voice-over specialists in your speed dial in case you need to record something quickly. If you've got an excellent voice, you may be required to provide a quick and standard voice over.